kiktmog@gmail.com 
TL;DR: Whenever our warehouse leads needed a quick safety stock calculation or a container pack estimate, they opened an Excel sheet with 14 tabs and broken macros. It was slow, ugly, and prone to overwritten formulas. Last Tuesday, I used Claude 3.5 Sonnet’s Artifacts feature to build four standalone interactive web calculators—with sliders, reactive graphs, … 더 읽기
TL;DR: In my last post, I shared how dirty spreadsheets cause a 31% silent error rate when processed through Claude or ChatGPT. Doing the 7-step pre-flight checklist by hand takes 6 minutes per file. If you run multiple vendor sheets a day, that friction kills the habit. I wrote a standalone 90-line Python script that … 더 읽기
TL;DR: After 90 days feeding real production spreadsheets to Claude and ChatGPT, I found 3 errors that kept recurring silently: date format collisions that skew averages, blank rows that inflate totals, and cross-sheet formula references that break the moment you upload a file to an AI session. None of them threw an error message. All … 더 읽기
TL;DR: Single-chat AI threads die by Day 5 of any real project. They forget your negative constraints, truncate background PDFs, and force you to re-paste guidelines twenty times. Both Anthropic’s Claude Projects and OpenAI’s Custom GPTs claim to solve this with dedicated project workspaces. After running a multi-week supplier freight RFP and a warehouse SLA … 더 읽기
TL;DR: Building an AI automation is easy; keeping it from silently breaking three weeks later is where 80% of workflows hit a brick wall. When an automated workflow fails, it rarely throws a clear error message—it quietly drops rows, loops endlessly on expired credentials, or sends unreviewed hallucinations to your executive team. Before deploying any … 더 읽기
TL;DR: After weeks of dissecting automation risks and warning about edge-case failures, it’s time for some good news: Aside on Windows is genuinely fun to use. Unlike early web bots that hijacked your mouse or trapped you in clunky terminal windows, the Windows build feels like an organic extension of your dual-monitor setup. Between background … 더 읽기
TL;DR: Most morning AI prompts are productivity theater. They don’t save time; they steal it. After two years of daily prompting experiments, I’ve permanently banned 90% of popular templates from my morning routine. Today, exactly three narrow prompts survive my 7:30 AM desk habit: a 90-second calendar buffer audit, an overnight unread email triage condenser, … 더 읽기
TL;DR: Agentic AI browsers like Aside represent a legitimate leap beyond copy-paste chatbots, but the industry hype conceals three major operational traps: the Supervision Paradox, subscription stacking bloat, and severe compliance liabilities. If a web task takes under two minutes manually, watching an AI browser execute it step-by-step makes you slower, not faster. Furthermore, paying … 더 읽기
TL;DR: Following our beginner guide on Aside’s $0 stack, I spent five full workdays testing Aside on a standard Windows enterprise desktop across our company’s messiest authenticated portals. Over 35 multi-step operational tasks, the agentic browser reclaimed 4.2 hours of mind-numbing data retrieval, but cost 1.1 hours in supervision and dynamic DOM troubleshooting — leaving … 더 읽기
TL;DR: Agentic browsers have spent the last year trapped in Mac-exclusive demos. With Aside’s September 2026 Windows release, autonomous web automation has finally arrived on enterprise desktop PCs. Unlike traditional AI chatbots that stop cold at login screens or require fragile API webhooks, Aside navigates your authenticated tabs directly. On the $0 Free Tier (500 … 더 읽기